Friday, October 14, 2011

Essay 6a

Essay 6a. North and South








Question: Did the Protestant Reformation have any bearing on the development of art of the northern Renaissance that would follow and if so, how was that art as compared to the southern, or Italian Renaissance and why?
Part One:
SUMMARY: The Renaissance was an age of new discoveries. In religion, Martin Luther challenged and caused a division of the Church which had united Europe throughout the Middle Ages. Great thinkers of the Renaissance thought of themselves as ushering in the modern age. The Protestant Reformation was a movement that also had profound implications on art. Just as Renaissance Humanists rejected medieval thought, the Reformation essentially rejected the medieval ways of Christianity. I believe the two are closely related as both Renaissance (southern) and Reformation (northern) art was greatly impacted by religion.


REASON: I believe the reason for this question was to help us to understand how religion impacted art and how art could also be used to influence religious thought. I believe it was also asked to helped us understand Humanist influences on art.


PURPOSE:  I believe this question is intended to help us understand how humanistic thought truly had an influence on art in both the Renaissance and Reformation. This topic also showed me that the rise of humanism did not really affect a decline in the importance of Christianity but that it actually helped intensify Christian spirituality through the fifteenth century and beyond.


DIRECTION: My research helped me to further understand how external influences such as religious beliefs could have such an impact on art.


IMPRESSIONS: I realized just how powerful an influence religion has had on art and how I believe it created a need for artists throughout history to “push the envelope” therefore greatly impacting artistic style.




Part Two:
Essay 6a              
Question: Did the Protestant Reformation have any bearing on the development of art of the northern Renaissance that would follow and if so, how was that art as compared to the southern, or Italian Renaissance and why?


The Renaissance, which comes from the Italian word rinascitá, which means "rebirth", welcomed creativity and change. There was a revival of the classical forms that were originally developed by the ancient Greeks and Romans, a greater interest in secular life and most importantly the ways people viewed themselves and their world. Art began to extend from its roots and therefore affecting the common ground of religion. During this time, people began to explore different and more richer types of human experience. A new emphasis on individual achievement began to evolve. At the heart of the Italian renaissance there was an intellectual movement known as humanism which was based on the study of classical culture. People began to focus on more worldly subjects rather than on religious issues that were so prevalent during the Protestant Reformation. This helped to strengthen the desire of people to explore and create and this new importance of the individual helped create a better balance between religion and what was once considered illicit. People now wanted to receive credit for their achievements instead of praising God for everything.
“Humanists believed that people were worthy and capable of determining their own destinies. This perspective contrasted sharply with the medieval view that humanity was irredeemably sinful and had value only through the infinite grace of God.” (Art History, Marilyn Stokstad, Pg. 614) The Renaissance was a time of Rebirth of the old Roman and Greek Civilization and therefore on Humanism which was based on the classical world. Francesco Petrarch is considered the father of humanism and although he did not reject Christianity he wanted to use classical thought to influence Christianity. Humanists wanted to reform Christianity for the better. (Art in Renaissance Italy. Paoletti, John T., and Gary M. Radke. Pg. 514)
In comparing Medieval and Renaissance Art, Medieval artists mostly painted saints and religious themes and did not present people with individual characteristics. Renaissance artists, however, contrasted between light and darkness and used three-dimensional images.


Giovanni Panini, Interior of a Picture Gallery with the Collection of Cardinal Silvio Valenti Gonzaga
In Florence, in the first half of the fifteenth century, there were great innovators in painting, sculpture and architecture, beginning a new era in the history of art. These included Masaccio (painting), Donatello (sculpture) and Brunelleschi (architecture). The idea of artistic genius became popular thus Michelangelo was called "divine" because of the greatness of his creative powers. (http://vlib.iue.it/carrie/texts/carrie_books/gilbert/07.html)




Donatello, St John the Evangelist




I believe the most influential artist of the Renaissance was Leonardo da Vinci. A talented painter and sculptor, he truly captured the ideals of the renaissance. In addition to The Last Supper, Leonardo's greatest known work is the Mona Lisa.
Leonardo da Vinci
Last Supper (1495-98)





Leonardo da Vinci
Mona Lisa (1503 - 1506)
In 1500 the Protestant Reformation resulted with the split in Western Christendom but most importantly the ideals of people. It began a new artistic tradition that was very different from the European humanist art produced during the Renaissance. “Protestant theology focused on the individual relationship between the worshipper and the divine.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Reformation_and_art). The focus on a person’s relationship with God is depicted in art during that time. Art that portrayed religious figures or scenes adhered to Protestant theology “by portraying people and stories that emphasized salvation through divine grace and not through personal deeds or by intervention of church bureaucracy.” Iconic images and portrayals of saints became less frequent. “One tragic consequence of the Reformation was the destruction of religious art. In some areas, Protestant zealots smashed sculpture and stained-glass windows and whitewashed religious painting to rid the churches of what they considered to be idolatrous images. (Art History, Marilyn Stokstad, 683)
(http://imagerepository.net/images/p/r/26/protestant-reformation-art/1-protestant-reformation-art.jpg)


Protestant religious art not only embraced Protestant values but assisted in spreading Protestantism Artists in Protestant countries focused on secular forms of art that included landscape and portrait painting and historical events. Narrative scenes from the Bible and depictions of a moralistic modern life became very popular. Most scenes depicted the Protestant view that salvation can only come through the grace of God.During that time, however, the Catholic Counter-Reformation responded to the Protestant criticisms of Roman Catholic art by creating a more stringent style of art.
Francisco Pacheco 1564-1654Don Diego González de Mendoza
During the Renaissance, the Church maintained control over art and therefore the people and their way of thinking. In comparison  “the Protestant Reformation was an attempt by the common people of Northern Europe to reclaim the experience of New Testament Christianity, both in their secular and religious lives.” (http://www.forerunner.com/forerunner/X0223_Western_Civilization.html)
While the Reformation was the outcome of the earlier Renaissance humanist artists who shed new light on things, the impact of Martin Luther sparked a great many religious controversies. (http://staff.jccc.net/jjackson/reformation.htm) These controversies as reflected in both renaissance and reformation art, although contradictory, were clearly joined by a common bond – religion.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Essay 3b













Art History: Ancient to Medieval - ARTS 1510 – 001








Essay 3b
Using specific art references, why did the Greeks consider "beauty" to be the same as "truth" and how different was this philosophy from that of the Romans?







Part One

SUMMARY:

"Beauty is truth, truth beauty"

                                 John Keats



In his poem, "Ode to a Grecian Urn," John Keats was inspired by his belief that classical Greek art was idealistic and captured Greek virtues. In the last lines of the poem he writes that "beauty is truth, truth beauty," – that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” For the Greek philosopher Plato, true beauty was an ideal beyond human perception. He portrayed beauty as eternal - like truth. (Gill) I believe this portrayal was carried over into all form of classical Greek art.








                                                              
                                                   Plato, Marble bust


In my quest to answer this question, I discovered that there were significant differences in Greek and Roman art which I believe were heavily influenced by the society in which they lived. The Greeks were more focused on philosophy and the more spiritual aspects of their existence while the Romans, it seems, were preoccupied with obtaining power and glory. While the Greeks exalted their gods in their art, the Romans portrayed themselves "in heroic terms." (Stokstad, 233)

My research has enabled me to look at both Greek and Roman art from a different perspective and it reminded me of a story I once heard about a group of third graders whose art was showcased at a gallery in New York. The invitees were told that the work showcased was that of a new but up and coming artist who was very popular in Europe. The attendees to the showing certainly viewed the artwork much more differently than they would have had they known it was created by elementary students. This exercise has helped me to understand that in order to better understand the art, one must have an understanding of the background or "history" of the art.











REASON:


I believe the reason for this particular question was to challenge us to consider the external influences or forces that surround classical art in order to see it from a different perspective. "Knowledge of the politics, religion, and culture of ancient Greece is vital to understanding its art." (Stokstad, 219)

PURPOSE:


I believe in order to better understand and most certainly appreciate art, the course is intended to teach us to think outside of the box .

DIRECTION: 


The exercise of researching and answering this topic has taught me to take all things into consideration as it pertains to art of a particular period. It also showed me how to differentiate between realism and idealism and that while the two are closely related they are very different as they pertain to the visual arts. (Stokstad, 178) As I am planning to visit Greece for the first time in January, I believe I am better equipped to more greatly appreciate the museums and ruins in Athens.

IMPRESSIONS:


I believe the greatest surprise for me was the idea that not only did the ancient Greeks incorporate the surreal into mythology but also into their art. The idea that they strived to achieve celestial perfection in their art as paying homage to their gods is now very apparent to me whereas it wasn't before. 











Part Two


ANSWER TO ESSAY QUESTION:


Historically, the Greeks were the primary influences of Romans artwork and although there are many similarities between Greek and Roman art, there are also significant differences. The Romans broke away from the Greek mold and developed techniques to express their own ideals and values. Because Romans were more interested in realism, their art is more naturalistic and less stylized then the Greeks who were more interested in idealism. (Gill)

The Greeks believed that art was an expression of perfection and worked to perfect the physical form of their objects. They often represented the gods in their art to express an ideal form of physical strength and beauty. 

The first and greatest period of classical art began in Greece about the middle of the 5th century BC. By that time Greek sculptors had learned to represent human physical form both naturally and easily. They considered their gods as people, but portrayed them as being much more beautiful. Their focus was on portraying ideal beauty rather than an individual which is reflected in their sculptures which achieved almost godlike perfection. (Montgomery)

An example of this is the beautiful marble statue "Aphrodite of Melos", commonly referred to as the "Venus de Milo" now exhibited in the Louvre, Paris. Another example is what is believed to be an original work of Praxiteles, the statue 'Hermes with the Infant Dionysus', the only statue that can be identified with one of the great Greek masters. The figure of Hermes is also known for its beauty as it portrays strength, grace, nobility and sweetness.

Venus de Milo, White Paros Marble, 100 B.C.

The greatest name in Greek sculpture is that of Phidias who planned and directed the sculptures decorating the Parthenon. It is thought that some of them may have been the work his own hand. Among his masterpieces were the huge gold and ivory statue of Athena which once stood in the temple and also which once stood in the temple at Olympia. Phidias sought ways to enrich the domain of art forever. In seeking the ways of the highest truth, his standards were truths that were immortal and divine therefore his work was focused on celestial, moral grandeur, and divine majesty. (Guisepi)

                                                                  
 The Parthenon, Limestone, Marble, 447-432 B.C.






Even the architectural buildings of the Greeks to perfection such as in The Temple of Hera and the Parthenon. The columns of both were curved toward the top and the pediment was also slightly curved to give the appearance of visual perfection. (Vasilika, 132)

Because the Romans often borrowed from the cultures that they conquered, many ideas and of the Greeks were "borrowed" by the Romans. In 146 BC, when Greece was conquered by Rome, Greek art heavily influenced Roman art, however, it was not imitated. They expressed their own uniqueness and dominating spirit, especially in their architecture. Unlike Greek art, Roman art was used not so much for the expression of noble ideas and emotions but for ostentatious decoration therefore losing spiritual quality. Roman art had a much more practical function. Artwork was primarily used for ornamentation and decoration. (Montgomery)


Ancient Roman Interior

Roman sculptors produced many vigorous realistic statues such as the beautiful bust of the young Augustus which has both historic and artistic value. So while Greek sculpture represents an unrealistic ideology, the Romans preferred to sculpt historical events and real people. (Guisepi)

Caesar Augustus, marble, 1st Century A.D.

While Greek and Roman art share similarities, the differences in art including their purpose, materials used, and influences of these two societies gives us some insight as to what these two cultures were all about. Their works of art cannot be seen outside of their culture or history. From the Greeks focus on the idea of perfection and intellectualism to the Romans focus on domination and power.

“We have never stopped trying to see how Greek and Roman art was seen, how it looked and was meant to look, what it meant and can mean.” (Beard and Henderson, 46)


Works Cited

Beard, Mary and Henderson, John. Classical Art: From Greece to Rome

Oxford University Press. New York. 2001


Stokstad, Marilyn. Art History. Harry N. Abrams. New York 1995


Vassilika, Eleni. Greek and Roman Art. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 1998


Comparing Ancient Roman and Greek Art. Jane Montgomery. March 2008

http://www.helium.com/items/955679-comparing-ancient-roman-and-greek-art


Comparisons Between Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. N.S. Gill  http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/greecevsrome/ss/GreecevsRome_2.htm


Greek and Roman Art. International World History Project. Edited by R.A. Guisepi 
history-world.org/arthist.htm